Many of us work in different market environments, but we often make the mistake of using a one-size-fits-all approach to our innovation strategies.
It's common to categorize innovation into disruptive, incremental, or radical types, but this oversimplifies the range of options available. We often make the mistake of refining our thinking too early without fully appreciating the complexities involved in pursuing different innovation strategies.
I admire Geoffrey Moore, the author of "Crossing the Chasm" and "Inside the Tornado," which are both great books to read. Some people believe that his ideas need to be modernized, and he has attempted to do so in a comprehensive update to "Crossing the Chasm." However, my personal favorite book of his is "Dealing with Darwin," where he expands on his ideas by proposing a framework that accurately represents the innovation options available to us.
According to him, every process has a distinct beginning, middle, and end. The economic factors governing these stages are varied and dictate how you should approach any innovation strategy.
He follows a category-maturity lifecycle that consists of four phases - early life, growth markets, mature markets, and declining markets, culminating in the final end-of-life phase.
He suggests taking a step back, comprehensively analyzing your current position within this lifecycle model, and observing the diverse market dynamics that emerge during this evaluation to enable innovative thinking.
The strategy involves dividing the various types into groups, specifically the four innovation zones: product leadership, customer intimacy, operational excellence, and category renewal.
The first three zones are characterized by the value discipline you aim to achieve. The last zone, category renewal, pertains to categories that can no longer support future value creation.
As you analyze and examine ideas, you may notice that many compete for limited mental space and resources. This can either discourage you or motivate you to pursue innovative solutions to fill these areas of opportunity. By embracing the latter perspective, you may even achieve a unique competitive advantage in the market.
The life-cycle model by category is a useful framework to analyze market forces that may impact your competitive strategy. Identifying different types of innovation can help you focus on specific phases, enabling you to differentiate clearly and gain a more distinct advantage over your competitors.
By utilizing these two frameworks, you can gain a more precise understanding of the innovation landscape. By recognizing the various types of innovation and identifying where they provide the greatest potential for innovation, taking a market-oriented and life cycle approach to your thinking becomes more effective.
While it may appear more complicated at first, exploring different types of innovation can unlock greater potential for effectively managing your portfolio of idea-to-product development across various markets that align with your level of experience.
Having fruitful discussions and creating a life cycle plan can facilitate market progression tailored to specific market curves.